こんにちは。SIOS OSSエバンジェリスト/セキュリティ担当の面 和毅です。
05/01/2018にLinux Kernelの脆弱性情報(CVE-2018-1000200)が公開されています。今回はこの脆弱性の概要と、各ディストリビューションの対応について簡単にまとめてみます。
Priority
Moderate
修正方法
各ディストリビューションの情報を確認してください。
CVE概要(詳細はCVEのサイトをご確認ください)
- http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-1000200
ローカルユーザによるDoSの可能性
重要度 – Moderate
4.14-4.16のLinux Kernelで、out of memory(oom)で大きな範囲のメモリをmlockして使用しているプロセスをkillする際に、NULLポインタ非参照が発生することによりDoSが発生する可能性があります。
4.17-rc5での修正は以下のようになります。
diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c index 9d5968d..d683656 100644 --- a/mm/mmap.c +++ b/mm/mmap.c @@ -3024,6 +3024,32 @@ void exit_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm) /* mm's last user has gone, and its about to be pulled down */ mmu_notifier_release(mm); + if (unlikely(mm_is_oom_victim(mm))) { + /* + * Manually reap the mm to free as much memory as possible. + * Then, as the oom reaper does, set MMF_OOM_SKIP to disregard + * this mm from further consideration. Taking mm->mmap_sem for + * write after setting MMF_OOM_SKIP will guarantee that the oom + * reaper will not run on this mm again after mmap_sem is + * dropped. + * + * Nothing can be holding mm->mmap_sem here and the above call + * to mmu_notifier_release(mm) ensures mmu notifier callbacks in + * __oom_reap_task_mm() will not block. + * + * This needs to be done before calling munlock_vma_pages_all(), + * which clears VM_LOCKED, otherwise the oom reaper cannot + * reliably test it. + */ + mutex_lock(&oom_lock); + __oom_reap_task_mm(mm); + mutex_unlock(&oom_lock); + + set_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags); + down_write(&mm->mmap_sem); + up_write(&mm->mmap_sem); + } + if (mm->locked_vm) { vma = mm->mmap; while (vma) { @@ -3045,24 +3071,6 @@ void exit_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm) /* update_hiwater_rss(mm) here? but nobody should be looking */ /* Use -1 here to ensure all VMAs in the mm are unmapped */ unmap_vmas(&tlb, vma, 0, -1); - - if (unlikely(mm_is_oom_victim(mm))) { - /* - * Wait for oom_reap_task() to stop working on this - * mm. Because MMF_OOM_SKIP is already set before - * calling down_read(), oom_reap_task() will not run - * on this "mm" post up_write(). - * - * mm_is_oom_victim() cannot be set from under us - * either because victim->mm is already set to NULL - * under task_lock before calling mmput and oom_mm is - * set not NULL by the OOM killer only if victim->mm - * is found not NULL while holding the task_lock. - */ - set_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags); - down_write(&mm->mmap_sem); - up_write(&mm->mmap_sem); - } free_pgtables(&tlb, vma, FIRST_USER_ADDRESS, USER_PGTABLES_CEILING); tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb, 0, -1); diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c index ff992fa..8ba6cb8 100644 --- a/mm/oom_kill.c +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c @@ -469,7 +469,6 @@ bool process_shares_mm(struct task_struct *p, struct mm_struct *mm) return false; } - #ifdef CONFIG_MMU /* * OOM Reaper kernel thread which tries to reap the memory used by the OOM @@ -480,16 +479,54 @@ static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(oom_reaper_wait); static struct task_struct *oom_reaper_list; static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(oom_reaper_lock); -static bool __oom_reap_task_mm(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm) +void __oom_reap_task_mm(struct mm_struct *mm) { - struct mmu_gather tlb; struct vm_area_struct *vma; + + /* + * Tell all users of get_user/copy_from_user etc... that the content + * is no longer stable. No barriers really needed because unmapping + * should imply barriers already and the reader would hit a page fault + * if it stumbled over a reaped memory. + */ + set_bit(MMF_UNSTABLE, &mm->flags); + + for (vma = mm->mmap ; vma; vma = vma->vm_next) { + if (!can_madv_dontneed_vma(vma)) + continue; + + /* + * Only anonymous pages have a good chance to be dropped + * without additional steps which we cannot afford as we + * are OOM already. + * + * We do not even care about fs backed pages because all + * which are reclaimable have already been reclaimed and + * we do not want to block exit_mmap by keeping mm ref + * count elevated without a good reason. + */ + if (vma_is_anonymous(vma) || !(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)) { + const unsigned long start = vma->vm_start; + const unsigned long end = vma->vm_end; + struct mmu_gather tlb; + + tlb_gather_mmu(&tlb, mm, start, end); + mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(mm, start, end); + unmap_page_range(&tlb, vma, start, end, NULL); + mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(mm, start, end); + tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb, start, end); + } + } +} + +static bool oom_reap_task_mm(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm) +{ bool ret = true; /* * We have to make sure to not race with the victim exit path * and cause premature new oom victim selection: - * __oom_reap_task_mm exit_mm + * oom_reap_task_mm exit_mm * mmget_not_zero * mmput * atomic_dec_and_test @@ -534,39 +571,8 @@ static bool __oom_reap_task_mm(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm) trace_start_task_reaping(tsk->pid); - /* - * Tell all users of get_user/copy_from_user etc... that the content - * is no longer stable. No barriers really needed because unmapping - * should imply barriers already and the reader would hit a page fault - * if it stumbled over a reaped memory. - */ - set_bit(MMF_UNSTABLE, &mm->flags); - - for (vma = mm->mmap ; vma; vma = vma->vm_next) { - if (!can_madv_dontneed_vma(vma)) - continue; + __oom_reap_task_mm(mm); - /* - * Only anonymous pages have a good chance to be dropped - * without additional steps which we cannot afford as we - * are OOM already. - * - * We do not even care about fs backed pages because all - * which are reclaimable have already been reclaimed and - * we do not want to block exit_mmap by keeping mm ref - * count elevated without a good reason. - */ - if (vma_is_anonymous(vma) || !(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)) { - const unsigned long start = vma->vm_start; - const unsigned long end = vma->vm_end; - - tlb_gather_mmu(&tlb, mm, start, end); - mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(mm, start, end); - unmap_page_range(&tlb, vma, start, end, NULL); - mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(mm, start, end); - tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb, start, end); - } - } pr_info("oom_reaper: reaped process %d (%s), now anon-rss:%lukB, file-rss:%lukB, shmem-rss:%lukB\n", task_pid_nr(tsk), tsk->comm, K(get_mm_counter(mm, MM_ANONPAGES)), @@ -587,14 +593,13 @@ static void oom_reap_task(struct task_struct *tsk) struct mm_struct *mm = tsk->signal->oom_mm; /* Retry the down_read_trylock(mmap_sem) a few times */ - while (attempts++ < MAX_OOM_REAP_RETRIES && !__oom_reap_task_mm(tsk, mm)) + while (attempts++ < MAX_OOM_REAP_RETRIES && !oom_reap_task_mm(tsk, mm)) schedule_timeout_idle(HZ/10); if (attempts <= MAX_OOM_REAP_RETRIES || test_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags)) goto done; - pr_info("oom_reaper: unable to reap pid:%d (%s)\n", task_pid_nr(tsk), tsk->comm); debug_show_all_locks();
主なディストリビューションの対応方法
詳細は、各ディストリビューションの提供元にご確認ください
Debian
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2018-1000200
Red Hat Enterprise Linux/CentOS
Ubuntu
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/2018/CVE-2018-1000200.html
SUSE/openSUSE
対処方法
各ディストリビューションの案内に従い、アップデートを行ってください。全てのRed Hat製品でパッチが行き渡っているかを確認するには、Red Hat SatelliteやKatello、Spacewalk等を使うと管理が便利でしょう。
また、OSの再起動が発生しますので、peacemakerなどOSSのクラスタ製品を使うとサービス断の時間を最小限にすることが出来ます。
[参考]
http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2018/q2/67
セキュリティ系連載案内
OSSセキュリティ技術の会による日経Linuxでの連載「IoT時代の最新SELinux入門」がITPro上で読めるようになりました。技術の会代表で第一人者である中村さん等による、最新のSELinuxの情報やコマンド類等も更新されているのでお薦めです。
OSSセキュリティ技術の会によるThinkITでの連載「開発者のためのセキュリティ実践講座」がThinkIT上で開始しました。技術の会の中の人間で、最新の代表的なOSSセキュリティ技術を紹介していきます。
OSSセキュリティ技術の会により、ThinkITでLinuxSecuritySummit 2017のレポートが紹介されています。
OSSセキュリティ技術の会の面により、@ITで「OSS脆弱性ウォッチ」が連載されています。